- Is it still worth focusing on top creators for your campaigns?
- What is really happening: why are top creators saying no?
- What changes in practice for campaign planners?
- Three practical scenarios: how does the strategy change for an e-commerce business, a studio, and a manufacturing company?
- Equity, operational roles, performance fees: what compensation models exist today?
- What rules and risks do you need to know before signing a creator partnership?
- Why is everyone talking about this now: has the creator marketing market really exploded?
- How to get started practically: the steps to redesign your creator strategy?
- What are the most common mistakes when dealing with top creators?
- How to figure out if your creator strategy is really working?
- So, is it worth redesigning the creator strategy for your company?
- How we see it at SHM
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Top creators are cutting back on the number of partnerships and asking for equity, operational roles, and product involvement: offering a fixed fee is no longer enough.
- 63% of creators prefer long-term collaborations, and performance-based compensation has grown from 23% to 53% of partnerships in just two years.
- Companies that enter negotiations late, with rigid briefs and spot budgets, are discarded in favor of brands willing to share value and creative control.
- Revisiting your negotiation approach before the next campaign isn't optional: it's the key to working with creators who truly move audiences.
A creator with 14 million followers stated they prefer five or six brands a year over a hundred one-off campaigns. If your company is used to buying visibility on rotation, the market is changing the rules under your feet.
Is it still worth focusing on top creators for your campaigns?
Yes, but only if you're willing to change how you approach them. The 'pay, post, move on' model no longer works with creators who truly matter.
The creator marketing market — advertising campaigns created in collaboration with creators and influencers on social media — is undergoing a structural shift. Creators with more loyal audiences are selecting the brands they work with, not the other way around. Those who do not adapt lose access to the most effective profiles and end up competing for the remaining available creators, often those with less engaged audiences.
The right question isn't 'how much does a post cost?' but 'what are we willing to offer to get on the exclusive list of a valuable creator?'
| Your situation | Should you change your approach? | why |
|---|---|---|
| You run spot campaigns with different creators every season | Yes | You are losing access to creators with loyal audiences |
| You already have an ongoing partnership with a creator | Yes | It's time to formalize it and dive deeper |
| You only work with micro-creators (under 100k followers) | Partially | The spot model holds up better, but quality still matters |
| You have a product on which the creator can have a real say | Yes | Equity and co-creation become a concrete negotiating lever |
| Your budget is rigid and the brief is non-negotiable | No, for now | Top creators are turning you down: better to focus on mid-tier profiles |
What is really happening: why are top creators saying no?
Top creators have realized that accepting too many one-off campaigns erodes the trust of their audience, which is their most valuable asset. Fewer deals, but deeper ones, protect their value over time.
At Advertising Week New York, the most followed creators explained their logic directly. A creator with 14 million followers said she prefers to work with five or six brands a year, focusing on equity deals — meaning a stake in the company — instead of fixed fees. Another creator with over four million followers turns down campaigns she doesn't consider high-performing and suggests brands "entrust them to some micro-creators." A third accepted the role of chief content officer at an eyewear company, complete with an office, product feedback, and directing credits.
This isn't about star tantrums. It's a rational response to a market that has treated creators as interchangeable advertising space, bought by impressions and replaced as soon as the numbers drop. The biggest creators are resisting to avoid falling into that spiral.
| Creator (source: Digiday) | Chosen approach | What they ask of the brand |
|---|---|---|
| Creator with 14M followers | Equity deal + co-creation | Company equity, creative involvement, products they actually use |
| Creator with 4M followers (dad creator) | Rigid selection + proprietary formats | Freedom of format, no rigid brief, real performance |
| Creator turned Chief Content Officer | Operational role in the company | Office, product say, directing credits |
| Media company founder | Branded integration in micro-series | Collaborators, not sponsors: involvement from the start |
What changes in practice for campaign planners?
The selection and negotiation process is getting longer and more complicated. It's no longer enough to send a brief and wait for a quote: you need to build a value proposition that the creator finds interesting.
The classic model — brief to the creator, quote, contract, post, report — doesn't disappear, but it becomes the path for mid-tier and micro creators. With larger profiles, the process increasingly resembles a negotiation between business partners. The brand must come to the table with more than just a budget.
Understand how things work today creator partnerships that drive real results it is the starting point to avoid wasting time and resources on approaches that get ignored.
- 1 · Brand / Marketing manager Map out strategic creators Identify 5-10 creators whose audience matches your ideal client. Don't just look at followers: consider audience loyalty and thematic consistency.
- 2 · Brand / Marketing manager Build a value proposition What can you offer besides compensation? Equity, product co-creation, advisory role, exclusive access to data or events. Define it before contacting the creator.
- 3 · Legal team / procurement Prepare flexible contract structures Standard contracts aren't enough. You need clauses for equity, product rights, multi-year terms, and performance-based compensation.
- 4 · Brand / Creator Involve the creator in the creative phase The creators who get the best results are those who get involved in the process before the brief is finalized. Leave room for their format and voice.
- 5 · Marketing manager Measure and renew Define shared KPIs from the start. A long-term partnership is only justified if the data confirms it: conversion rate, sentiment, attributable sales.
Three practical scenarios: how does the strategy change for an e-commerce business, a studio, and a manufacturing company?
The partnership model evolves differently depending on the industry and product type. Here are three typical situations with the calculation of the value at stake.
Illustrative examples: numbers are used to show the calculation logic, they are not real client data.
| Company type | Current situation | New approach | Potential value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fashion e-commerce (50k/year budget) | 5 one-off campaigns with different creators, high CPM, low loyalty | 1-2 annual partnerships with brand-aligned creators, mixed compensation (fixed fee + % of sales) | Lower cost per acquisition, more loyal audience, reusable content |
| Professional studio (B2B consulting) | No creator activity, visibility entrusted to organic LinkedIn | Partnership with 1 niche creator in the industry (finance, HR, legal) for educational mini-series | Qualified leads, industry authority, evergreen content |
| Manufacturing company (technical product) | Spot campaigns on YouTube with generalist creators, low relevance | Co-development of technical content with a specialized creator, potential advisory role on the product | Technical credibility, access to professional communities, differentiation from competitors |
Equity, operational roles, performance fees: what compensation models exist today?
The market has fragmented into at least four distinct models. Choosing the wrong one means losing the creator or overpaying for mediocre results.
Performance-based compensation — payment tied to clicks, conversions, or sales — grew from 23% of partnerships in 2024 to 53% in 2026, according to the Brand Deals Report 2026 by Influencer Marketing Factory . This data alone explains why bigger creators prefer few brands: they only want to work with products they'd bet their earnings on.
| Compensation model | How it works | Suitable for | Main risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed fee | One-off payment per content or campaign | Micro and mid-tier creators, spot campaigns | No alignment on business goals |
| Performance fee | Payment tied to trackable conversions, sales, or clicks | E-commerce, products with a measurable funnel | The creator avoids products they aren't sure about |
| Equity (company shares) | The creator receives a percentage of the company | Growth-stage brand with a strong product | Legal complexity, long-term expectations |
| Operational role (corporate title) | The creator comes in as a consultant or executive | Brands that want to co-create product and content | Requires clear governance and real autonomy |
What rules and risks do you need to know before signing a creator partnership?
In Italy, there are specific regulatory requirements for working with prominent creators. Ignoring them exposes the brand to fines and reputation damage.
In July 2025, AGCOM has approved the Guidelines and Code of Conduct for Italian influencers (resolution 197/25/CONS). Applies to "relevant influencers": those with at least 500,000 followers on one platform or at least one million average monthly views. Involves about 2,000 active creators in Italy.
For brands, this means that every sponsored post must be clearly identified as such, with transparency obligations falling on both the creator and the advertiser. Before signing a contract, verify that the creator complies with the code and that the contract includes compliance clauses.
On the reputational front, the main risk is the «sellout» effect: a creator who publishes too many sponsored posts loses credibility in the eyes of their audience, and that damage also transfers to the brand. This is one of the reasons why the most careful creators select partners with care — and why you should too.
| Risk | Who is exposed | How to mitigate |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to disclose sponsorship | Brand + creator | Contract with AGCOM compliance clause, review of posts before publication |
| Reputational damage from oversaturation | brand | Choose creators with a limited roster, avoid those who publish more than 2-3 sponsored posts per month |
| Legally unstructured equity | Brand + creator | Involve a lawyer specializing in creator deals before signing |
| KPIs not defined in advance | brand | Agree on performance metrics in the contract, not after the campaign is over |
| Creator who abandons the partnership | brand | Minimum duration clauses and penalties proportional to the deal value |
Why is everyone talking about this now: has the creator marketing market really exploded?
Yes. Global spending on creator advertising is growing four times faster than the rest of the media industry, and the Italian market also exceeded 490 million euros in 2025.
According to IAB's 2025 Creator Economy Ad Spend & Strategy Report , global spending on creator advertising in the USA reached 37 billion dollars in 2025, with a year-on-year growth of 26%. The forecast for 2026 is 44 billion. In Italy, according to data from Influencer Marketing Conference 2026 reported by Media Key , the market closed in 2025 at 490 million euros (+5% compared to 2024), with a forecast of 550 million in 2026.
The most interesting signal for those planning campaigns is another: in 2025, the number of content pieces produced decreased by 2%, but the average interaction per content increased. Fewer posts, more quality, more engagement. It's exactly the direction top creators are indicating with their choices.

How to get started practically: the steps to redesign your creator strategy?
Start with an audit of existing partnerships and define what you're willing to offer. Only then contact the creators.
Before reaching out to any creator, it is worth understanding how it works today creator partnership logic on Instagram and which metrics truly matter for measuring ROI. The starting point is always internal: what can you offer that another brand doesn't?
- Audit of past campaigns. Look at the past 12 months: which creators drove actual conversions? Which ones only brought in impressions? Cut the latter from your future roster.
- Define your value proposition. Besides compensation, what can you offer? Early access to the product, co-creation, equity, advisory role? Put it in writing before opening any negotiations.
- Select 5-10 strategic creators. Don't just look at followers. Check the engagement rate, audience loyalty, thematic consistency with your brand, and the number of active sponsors.
- Reach out to the creator (or their manager) with a proposal, not a brief. Explain why your brand matters to their audience. Leave room for their reply before sending any documents.
- Structure the contract with flexible clauses. Duration, shared KPIs, compensation methods (fixed, performance, equity), AGCOM compliance obligations. Involve a specialized lawyer.
- Get into the creative process early. Creators who get the best results are those involved before the brief is finalized. Share objectives, not executions.
What are the most common mistakes when dealing with top creators?
The most frequent is to come with a rigid brief and a fixed budget, as if you were buying advertising space. The biggest creators recognize it immediately and move on.
Another common mistake is confusing reach (the number of followers) with effectiveness. On TikTok, 72% of brand-creator relationships end after a single campaign, according to the Brand Deals Report 2026 . This means most brands don't build anything lasting, and the creators know it.
You can learn more about how Meta has redesigned tools to connect brands and creators , but having the right tools is not enough if your negotiation approach is still stuck in five years ago.
| Error | Why it is a problem | How to fix it |
|---|---|---|
| Rigid brief sent without prior dialogue | The creator ignores it or asks for a very high fee to compensate for the loss of freedom | Start with a conversation, not a document |
| Looking only at followers, not engagement | A large audience does not mean a loyal or relevant audience for your product | Analyze engagement rate and comment quality |
| One-off spot campaigns | The audience doesn't associate the brand with the creator, the effect fades in a few days | Plan at least 3-6 months of ongoing collaboration |
| No AGCOM compliance clause in the contract | Risk of penalties for both parties | Include disclosure and review obligations prior to publication |
| KPIs defined only after the campaign ends | Impossible to optimize or renegotiate on the fly | Define shared metrics before signing |
How to figure out if your creator strategy is really working?
Vanity metrics — likes, impressions, follower growth — aren't enough. You need indicators that tie the partnership to business goals.
Measuring the return on creator campaigns is one of the most talked-about topics in the industry. It is worth reading how to calculate the ROI of creator marketing even in physical events , where measurement is even more complex. For digital campaigns, the signals to monitor are more direct.
| Indicator | What it measures | Alert threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Conversion rate attributed to the creator | How many sales or leads come from the creator's link or code | Under 1% on e-commerce campaigns: review the format or the product |
| Engagement rate (interactions / followers) | How active and engaged the audience is | Under 2% on Instagram: the audience is not loyal |
| Comment sentiment | How the audience perceives the partnership | Negative comments on the sponsorship: a sign of oversaturation |
| Average duration of the collaboration | Continuity of the partnership over time | Under 3 months: you're still in the spot model |
| Cost per acquisition (CPA) vs paid channels | Cost efficiency compared to paid ad campaigns | If creator CPA is higher than paid ads with no brand benefits: renegotiate |

So, is it worth redesigning the creator strategy for your company?
It is worth it if you have a product that a creator can have a say in, a budget that allows for multi-year partnerships, and the flexibility to negotiate beyond a fixed fee. In that case, top creators offer you loyal audiences that no paid campaign can replicate.
A middle ground if you work with mid-tier creators (100k-1M followers) and can offer at least continuity and creative freedom. The pure one-off model works less, but a six-month partnership with a vertical creator can already make a difference.
Not yet if if your brief is rigid, the budget is fixed, and you can't offer anything beyond compensation. In that case, micro-creators (under 100k followers) with niche audiences are the most efficient choice, at least until the approach changes.
How we see it at SHM
For us, creator marketing works when it stops being a channel and becomes a relationship. The brands that get the best results don't buy visibility: they build alliances with creators who believe in the product. It's the same logic we apply when we help our clients structure Meta campaigns or google ads campaigns : the numbers get better when the strategy is built on clear, measurable goals, not cookie-cutter formulas.
We believe that innovation should be analyzed and transformed into lasting value, not chased like a fad. The fact that top creators are asking for equity and operational roles isn't a fad: it's a sign that the market is maturing towards more solid partnership models. Companies that understand this now have an advantage over those who wait for it to become the standard.
If you want to figure out how to build a creator strategy that actually works for your business, you can check out our approach to strategic AI integration to optimize the selection and measurement of partnerships, or contact us directly for an evaluation of your specific case. You can find all the articles in the cluster Marketing and ADV performance to dive deeper into every aspect of the strategy.
Frequently Asked Questions
It's a documented trend among creators with more loyal and numerous audiences. Creators with millions of followers have realized that accepting too many one-off campaigns erodes their audience's trust, which is their main asset. For micro-creators (under 100k followers), the one-off model still holds, but even there, the quality of the match with the brand matters more and more.
It means giving up a share of the company's ownership to the creator, as you would with a partner or investor. In return, the creator has a direct economic interest in the brand's success and tends to work with more commitment and continuity. It's a complex structure that requires a specialized lawyer and clear governance, but for growing brands with a strong product, it can be the most effective lever.
Look at the engagement rate (interactions divided by followers): below 2% on Instagram is a sign of a poorly engaged audience. Also analyze the quality of comments: generic comments or emojis do not indicate loyalty. The 2026 Brand Deals Report by Influencer Marketing Factory shows that on TikTok, 72% of brand-creator relationships end after just one campaign, a sign that the audience does not easily build loyalty.
From July 2025, AGCOM has approved the Guidelines and Code of Conduct for Italian influencers (resolution 197/25/CONS). It applies to creators with at least 500,000 followers on one platform or at least one million average monthly views. The brand is jointly responsible for the correct disclosure of sponsored content: include compliance clauses in the contract and check posts before publication.
For most SMEs, top creators with millions of followers are not the most efficient choice. The most suitable strategy is to work with vertical creators in your own sector (often with 50k-500k followers), offering continuity, creative freedom, and, where possible, product involvement. The results in terms of engagement and conversion are often superior to those of generalist creators with larger audiences.
The main KPIs are: conversion rate attributed to the creator (via dedicated link or code), cost per acquisition compared to paid channels, sentiment of comments, and duration of the collaboration. A partnership lasting less than three months is unlikely to produce lasting brand effects. Define the metrics in the contract before starting, not after the campaign is over.
The real competitive edge isn't finding the right creator: it's becoming the brand that top creators actually want to work with.
Related articles
Discover more articles exploring similar topics, selected to offer you a more complete and stimulating perspective. Each piece of content is carefully chosen to enrich your experience.