- Does this acquisition really affect me, or is it just financial news?
- What really happened, and why did Salesforce pay so much?
- What is lock-in, and why is it the real risk to watch?
- What changes in practice for those who run campaigns every day?
- Three concrete scenarios: what changes for an e-commerce, a professional firm, and a manufacturing company?
- Consolidate your stack or keep multiple vendors: what are the real pros and cons?
- AI in campaigns: a real opportunity or a risk of sameness?
- Why everyone's talking about it now: is the martech market really at a turning point?
- What mistakes are most common when evaluating a stack change?
- How do I know if my marketing stack is really working?
- So, is it worth consolidating everything on Salesforce for your company?
- How we see it at SHM
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Salesforce is acquiring Braze for $5.66 billion: closing is expected in fiscal year 2028, but stack decisions need to be made now.
- The main risk isn't price: it's lock-in, meaning finding your data and campaigns trapped inside a single ecosystem that's hard to leave.
- 41% of companies are already cutting unused martech tools: the acquisition increases the pressure to consolidate, but consolidating without a strategy can be costly.
- The right question isn't 'Salesforce yes or no,' but 'how much control do I want to keep over my data and my campaign flows?'
Salesforce has just offered $5.66 billion to buy Braze — a 58% premium over its market price. If you use either of these tools for your campaigns, the question isn't "interesting news?" but "what do I do now with my marketing stack?"
Does this acquisition really affect me, or is it just financial news?
If you use Braze, Salesforce Marketing Cloud or any marketing automation tool connected to a CRM, this deal changes the game. Not tomorrow, but within the next 18-24 months.
On October 20, 2026, Salesforce announced a definitive agreement to acquire Braze for approximately $5.66 billion, offering $47.50 per share in cash — a 58% premium over the closing price before the announcement, as reported in the official SEC filing. Closing is expected in Salesforce's fiscal year 2028, subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.
Braze is a customer engagement platform — in simple terms, a tool that manages personalized communications via email, push notifications, SMS and in-app messages, in real time. It's not a classic CRM: it's the layer that turns customer data into relevant messages at the right moment.
If your company uses Braze directly, uses Salesforce Marketing Cloud for campaigns, or has an architecture with several connected tools, this deal affects your budget and technology choices in the coming years.
| Your current situation | Impact of the acquisition | Urgency of assessment |
|---|---|---|
| You use Braze as your main tool | Product roadmap aligns with Salesforce; pricing and contracts may change | High — review your contract and data portability clauses |
| You use Salesforce Marketing Cloud | Braze may integrate or overlap; wait for official communications | Medium — monitor the Salesforce roadmap |
| You use alternative tools (HubSpot, Klaviyo, etc.) | The market is consolidating: less competition, possible price increases | Medium — assess your dependence on a single vendor |
| You have a fragmented stack with many tools | Pressure to consolidate increases; lock-in risk if you choose poorly | High — it's time to get organized with a clear strategy |
| You don't use marketing automation tools yet | The market is getting simpler but more concentrated; entering now takes more care in your choice | Low — you have time to choose well |
What really happened, and why did Salesforce pay so much?
Braze was growing 24% a year and had 2,609 enterprise customers. Salesforce bought a real-time engagement engine that was missing from its ecosystem.
Braze was not a struggling startup. In the fiscal year ending January 2026, revenue reached $738.2 million, up 24.4% from the previous year, according to Braze's official results. Customers with annual contracts above $500,000 grew 35% year over year.
One metric that tells you how healthy a software company is is the net retention rate — how much more existing customers spend year after year. Braze recorded a rate of 109% for all customers and 110% for its largest customers, as confirmed by the July 2026 quarterly SEC report. That means customers aren't just staying, they're spending more every year.
For Salesforce, the acquisition fills a specific gap: Braze handles real-time engagement, while Salesforce excels at data and CRM. Together, they promise a continuous flow: customer data informs the campaign, and campaign results flow back into the CRM.
What is lock-in, and why is it the real risk to watch?
Lock-in is when your data, campaigns and automation logic become so intertwined with a single tool that switching becomes too expensive. It's not a theoretical risk: it has already happened with other ecosystems.
Salesforce says it supports an open, composable approach, meaning you can connect different tools to each other. But attendees at Braze's Forge conference, quoted by Digiday, have already raised concrete questions: How easy will it be to export data? Will integrations with external tools keep working? Who is responsible when an AI automation gets it wrong?
Braze's co-founder and CTO said explicitly that a human being should press the send button. That's a positive signal on governance, meaning who controls what the system does. But governance doesn't depend on statements alone. It depends on how the contract is written and how the data is structured.
For a mid-sized Italian company, lock-in shows up in three practical ways: difficulty migrating contact lists, loss of the segmentation logic built over time, and disruption to email deliverability, meaning the ability of your emails to reach the inbox instead of spam.
| Lock-in risk | How it shows up | How to protect yourself |
|---|---|---|
| Trapped data | You can't export segments, behavior history or custom attributes | Check the data portability clauses in your contract right away |
| Proprietary campaign logic | Your automations use features that don't exist in other tools | Document every flow independently of the platform |
| Vendor-dependent deliverability | Switching email platforms means rebuilding your domain reputation | Keep control of your sending domain and IP warm-up |
| Broken integrations | A platform update breaks the connectors with other tools | Use standard APIs and monitor critical integrations |
| Price increases after the acquisition | The vendor raises prices knowing that migrating is expensive | Negotiate multi-year contracts with clear exit clauses |
What changes in practice for those who run campaigns every day?
In the short term, almost nothing. In the medium term, the product roadmap will change and some features may be moved or merged. The time to prepare is now, not when the official announcement arrives.
The deal is expected to close in Salesforce's fiscal year 2028. That means the products will keep working as they do today for at least 12-18 months. But the purchasing, renewal and integration decisions you make now will take effect right in that period.
If you run campaigns every day, there are three concrete things to do: understand what data you have and where it lives, check that the integrations between your tools are documented, and assess whether Salesforce's direction fits your marketing strategy.
- 1 · Marketing managerMap your current stackList all the tools you use, how they're connected and where your customer data lives.
- 2 · Procurement / ITReview contracts coming up for renewalCheck the data portability clauses, exit conditions and automatic renewal terms.
- 3 · Marketing managerDocument your automation logicEvery campaign flow should be described independently of the platform, so you can replicate it elsewhere if needed.
- 4 · Management / CFOAssess risk concentrationHow much of your marketing depends on a single vendor? If it's more than 70%, it's time to diversify.
- 5 · Marketing manager / AgencyMonitor the Salesforce roadmapIn the coming months Salesforce will announce how it will integrate Braze. Read the official announcements before making decisions.
Three concrete scenarios: what changes for an e-commerce, a professional firm, and a manufacturing company?
The impact depends a lot on how you use marketing automation tools today. Here are three typical situations and what they mean.
The scenarios below are illustrative: the numbers show the reasoning and are not real client data.
| Company type | Typical situation | Impact of the acquisition | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-commerce (50-200 orders/day) | Uses Braze or Klaviyo for email and push; Salesforce CRM for customer data | Possible native integration between the two tools; risk of price increases in 2028 | Check segment portability and negotiate the contract before renewal |
| Professional firm (10-30 people) | Uses HubSpot or simpler tools; little advanced automation | Indirect impact: the market consolidates, with fewer mid-market alternatives | No urgent action; see whether Braze/Salesforce AI features become available at lower prices |
| B2B manufacturing company | Salesforce CRM for the sales team; email marketing managed separately | The Braze integration could simplify post-sale communication and nurturing | Assess whether the integration adds real value or just complexity and cost |
Consolidate your stack or keep multiple vendors: what are the real pros and cons?
There's no one-size-fits-all answer. It depends on your size, the complexity of your campaigns and how much control you want to keep over your data.
According to CMSWire/MarTech, 41% of companies are actively cutting martech tools, driven by CFOs demanding a 3-5x return on investment on every renewal. Spending on marketing tools was about 19.4% of total marketing budgets in 2025, down from previous years.
This figure points to real pressure: companies have piled up too many tools, often overlapping, and now need to clean house. The Salesforce-Braze acquisition speeds up that pressure, but consolidating in a hurry without a strategy can lead to exactly the lock-in you wanted to avoid.
| Approach | Advantages | Drawbacks | Suitable for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated stack (e.g. all Salesforce) | Fewer integrations to manage, centralized data, single support | High lock-in, high costs, dependence on one vendor | Large companies with a structured IT team |
| Composable stack (multiple specialized vendors) | Flexibility, best-in-class tools for each function, distributed risk | More integrations to maintain, fragmented data | SMEs with specific needs and an agile team |
| Hybrid stack (Salesforce core + specialized tools) | A balance between integration and flexibility | Requires clear governance and documentation | Fast-growing mid-market companies |
AI in campaigns: real opportunity or risk of sameness?
AI speeds up content production and personalization, but using the same tools with the same signals risks making all campaigns look alike.
Braze's CEO said something important at the Forge conference: speed is only valuable if you use it to create something distinctive, not to produce more of the same content as everyone else. It's a warning that applies to any AI tool, not just Braze.
This topic ties directly into how campaigns are changing in the age of AI. If you want to understand how AI is reshaping product discovery and the buying journey, our analysis of Amazon Full-Funnel Campaigns and AI targeting shows concretely what changes for anyone running ads. Likewise, the issue of algorithmic transparency, meaning how much control you really have over your campaigns, is at the heart of our analysis of the Facebook algorithm and campaign control.
AI governance, meaning knowing what the system does, being able to control it and knowing who is responsible when something goes wrong, is not a technical detail. It's a matter of corporate responsibility. Braze's CTO said explicitly: "We want the send button to be pressed by a human being." We share that position, but it has to be verified in practice, not just in statements.
Why everyone's talking about it now: is the martech market really at a turning point?
Yes. The combination of vendor consolidation, CFO pressure on tool ROI and the acceleration of AI is reshaping the market structurally, not cyclically.
Salesforce holds 20% of the global CRM market in software revenue, keeping the lead for the 13th consecutive year according to data published by Salesforce based on the IDC tracker. No other vendor exceeds 5%. With Braze, Salesforce further strengthens an already dominant position.
The European Cloud CRM market (cloud-based customer management systems) was worth $13.49 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $14.23 billion in 2026, according to Mordor Intelligence. Salesforce, Microsoft and Oracle together hold roughly 55-60% of European revenue.
In Italy, the AI market reached €1.8 billion in 2025, up 50% from 2024, according to the Osservatori Digital Innovation at Politecnico di Milano. 71% of large Italian companies have launched at least one AI project, but only 1 in 5 uses AI widely. This means most companies are still in the experimentation phase: the time to build a solid strategy is now, before the market consolidates further.
What mistakes are most common when evaluating a stack change?
The most common is choosing based on a product's features while ignoring migration costs and data portability. The second is waiting too long, when contracts have already expired and you have no negotiating power left.
People who run campaigns tend to evaluate tools by the features on offer: how many automations, how many channels, how nice the interface looks. But attendees at Braze's Forge conference raised far more concrete questions: how much does it cost to migrate data? How do you preserve email deliverability during the switch? Who manages the learning curve of the new tool?
Another frequent mistake is confusing simplification with savings. Consolidating with a single vendor reduces the number of invoices, but not necessarily total costs, especially if the vendor uses lock-in to raise prices at renewal. Tracking and campaign measurement are closely linked: if you want to understand how Safari's tracking blocking is already changing how your campaigns are measured, the analysis on Safari and tracking blocking in ADV campaigns offers a practical overview.
| Common mistake | Why it is risky | How to avoid it |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluating only features, not portability | You only notice the lock-in when you want to leave | Always ask: 'How do I export all my data in a standard format?' |
| Waiting for the acquisition to close before deciding | The best contracts are negotiated before, not after | Review the renewals expiring in the next 12 months now |
| Consolidating without documenting | If the vendor changes the terms, you don't know what you've built | Document every flow, segment and integration independently |
| Ignoring AI governance | You don't know what the system does or who is responsible for errors | Define who approves each automated communication before you activate it |
| Choosing based on the vendor's brand | The best-known vendor isn't always the best fit for your size | Assess the total cost of ownership, not just the list price |
How do I know if my marketing stack is really working?
Looking at campaign metrics isn't enough. You also need to measure the health of your architecture: data portability, integration coverage and the real cost per active feature.
Measurement is central in other contexts too: for example, how video metrics change with YouTube's new view count is analyzed in the article on YouTube and view counts for marketers. The same principle applies to your stack: measuring well is the foundation of deciding well.
| Indicator | How it is measured | Alert threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Data portability | Export a sample of customer data and check that it's complete and in a standard format (CSV, JSON) | If you can't export on your own, you're already locked in |
| Integration coverage | How many of your critical integrations have a documented, up-to-date API? | Below 70% of integrations on standard APIs: high risk |
| Cost per active feature | Divide the monthly cost by the number of features you actually use | If you use less than 40% of the features you pay for, you're wasting budget |
| Email deliverability | Inbox placement rate (not spam) over the last 4 weeks | Below 90%: an urgent problem to fix before any migration |
| Estimated migration time | Ask the vendor: how long does it take to export everything and start over elsewhere? | Over 3 months: significant lock-in |
So, is it worth consolidating everything on Salesforce for your company?
It's worth it if you already have Salesforce CRM as your core system, an IT team that manages integrations, and multi-year contracts with clear exit clauses. In that case, integrating with Braze could genuinely simplify data flow and reduce the cost of connecting systems.
A middle path: you're in a growth phase and weighing which stack to adopt. Wait for Salesforce to publish the official Braze integration roadmap, then compare the total cost with composable alternatives like HubSpot + Klaviyo or similar solutions. Don't decide under pressure.
Not yet if you're an SME with fewer than 50 people, you use simple tools and you don't have a dedicated IT team. The cost and complexity of a full Salesforce ecosystem outweigh the benefits. You're better off with specialized, lighter tools and easily exportable data.
How we see it at SHM
For us, the Salesforce-Braze acquisition is a reminder that technology is a means, not an end. We believe choosing a marketing stack isn't a technical decision: it's a strategic one about how much control you want to keep over your data, your customers and your ability to change course when the market shifts.
We've worked with companies standing at exactly this crossroads: a stack that grew by accumulation, contracts about to expire, and the CFO pushing to "clean things up." In those cases, the first thing we do isn't choose the vendor: it's map what's already there, what really works and what can be simplified without losing flexibility. Only then do we assess whether to consolidate, diversify or go hybrid.
If you're thinking about how to reorganize your marketing stack or how to integrate AI tools into your campaigns, the starting point is always an honest analysis of where you are today. You can explore our approach to strategic AI integration, data processing and business intelligence and managing Google Ads campaigns and Meta. You'll find all the articles in the Marketing and ADV performance cluster to dig deeper into every aspect.
Frequently Asked Questions
There's no immediate operational urgency: the acquisition is expected to close in Salesforce's fiscal year 2028. But now is the right time to review your current contract, check the data portability clauses and document the logic behind your automations. Waiting until closing means less negotiating power.
It's impossible to know for sure right now. Historically, software acquisitions lead to pricing plan reorganizations within 12-24 months of closing. The best way to protect yourself is to negotiate multi-year contracts with clear exit clauses before the integration is complete.
Lock-in is when your data, campaigns and automations are so intertwined with a single tool that switching becomes too expensive or complicated. To find out if you're already there, try exporting a full sample of your customer data in a standard format: if you can't do it on your own, or if the process takes weeks, you're already locked in.
For SMEs with marketing automation needs, the most common alternatives include HubSpot (more accessible for mid-sized companies), Klaviyo (specialized in e-commerce), ActiveCampaign and Mailchimp for lower volumes. The right choice depends on your main channel, your contact volume and how complex your automations need to be.
AI can speed up the production of content variants, optimize send times and personalize messages. The risk, as Braze's own CEO pointed out, is that using the same tools with the same signals makes all campaigns look alike. AI is useful if you use it to do distinctive things, not just to produce more content.
The real cost isn't just the monthly fee: it includes your team's time managing integrations, the migration cost if you switch tools, lost email deliverability during a transition, and the opportunity cost of features you pay for but don't use. A practical rule: if you use less than 40% of the features you pay for, you're wasting budget.
The real question isn't which platform to choose, but how much freedom of choice you want to keep two years from now.
Related articles
Discover more articles exploring similar topics, selected to offer you a more complete and stimulating perspective. Each piece of content is carefully chosen to enrich your experience.
